Cases 1 - 10 of 652
Saquing v. Mallett et al
as 3:2020cv00182
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Ronald Ellzy Woodall, Wexler Medical
and others
Plaintiff:
John Milton Saquing
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Epps et al
as 3:2017cv00856
Plaintiff:
Cleveland E. Johnson
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps, Shannon Warnock
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Hall et al
as 3:2017cv00807
Plaintiff:
Scooter Lynn Robinson
Defendant:
Pelicia Hall, Jerry Williams, Jacquelyn Banks
and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Wedgeworth v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2017cv00730
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, M.D.O.C., Christopher B. Epps
and others
Plaintiff:
Wiley Wedgeworth
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Logan v. Barbour et al
as 5:2017cv00119
Plaintiff:
Courtney R. Logan
Defendant:
Haley R. Barbour, Timothy H. Jones, Ricky L. Banks
and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Faust v. Managment and Training Corp. et al
as 5:2016cv00072
Plaintiff:
Terry Faust
Defendant:
Managment and Training Corp., Wilkinson County Correctional Fac., Frank B. Shaw
and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. Epps et al
as 1:2015cv00308
Plaintiff:
Thomas Earl Ellis
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps, Phil Bryant, Unknown Bartee
and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Logan v. Barbour et al
as 5:2015cv00080
Plaintiff:
Courtney R. Logan
Defendant:
Haley Barbour, Christopher Epps, Jody Bradley
and others
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ferguson v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv00261
Plaintiff:
James M. Ferguson
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections , Christopher Epps , Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Fisher et al
as 1:2015cv00220
Plaintiff:
James Irvin Hill
Defendant:
Marshall Fisher, Jerry Williams, Raymond Byrd
and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
