Cases 1 - 10 of 668
Saquing v. Mallett et al
as 3:2020cv00182
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Ronald Ellzy Woodall, Wexler Medical and others
Plaintiff:
John Milton Saquing
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Williams et al
as 4:2018cv00229
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Pelicia Hall, Jerry Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Scooter Lynn Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Robinson v. Hall et al
as 3:2017cv00807
Plaintiff:
Scooter Lynn Robinson
Defendant:
Pelicia Hall, Jerry Williams, Jacquelyn Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Logan v. Barbour et al
as 5:2017cv00119
Plaintiff:
Courtney R. Logan
Defendant:
Haley R. Barbour, Timothy H. Jones, Ricky L. Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Lee et al
as 4:2017cv00102
Plaintiff:
Devin Bennett
Defendant:
Earnest Lee, Timothy Morris, Pelicia Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGowan v. Epps et al
as 4:2016cv00242
Plaintiff:
Michael McGowan
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Emmitt L. Sparkman, Marshal Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Faust v. Managment and Training Corp. et al
as 5:2016cv00072
Plaintiff:
Terry Faust
Defendant:
Managment and Training Corp., Wilkinson County Correctional Fac., Frank B. Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. State of Mississippi et al
as 4:2016cv00006
Plaintiff:
Detrick Dewayne Harris
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Christopher Epps, E. L. Sparkman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Logan v. Barbour et al
as 4:2015cv00121
Petitioner:
Courtney R. Logan
Respondent:
Haley Barbour, Christopher Epps, Jody Bradley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Logan v. Barbour et al
as 5:2015cv00080
Plaintiff:
Courtney R. Logan
Defendant:
Haley Barbour, Christopher Epps, Jody Bradley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
