Cases 31 - 40 of 1,266
Shawn States v. Christopher Epps, Commissioner
as 16-60084
Petitioner - Appellant:
SHAWN M. STATES
Respondent - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Harris v. State of Mississippi et al
as 4:2016cv00006
Plaintiff:
Detrick Dewayne Harris
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Christopher Epps, E. L. Sparkman
and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas Ellis v. Christopher Epps, et al
as 15-60752
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS EARL ELLIS
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS, PHIL BRYANT, SERGEANT BARTEE
and others
Ferlando Esco v. Christopher Epp
as 15-60708
Petitioner - Appellant:
FERLANDO ESCO
Respondent - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS
Ellis v. Epps et al
as 1:2015cv00308
Plaintiff:
Thomas Earl Ellis
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps, Phil Bryant, Unknown Bartee
and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Logan v. Barbour et al
as 4:2015cv00121
Petitioner:
Courtney R. Logan
Respondent:
Haley Barbour, Christopher Epps, Jody Bradley
and others
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Logan v. Barbour et al
as 5:2015cv00080
Plaintiff:
Courtney R. Logan
Defendant:
Haley Barbour, Christopher Epps, Jody Bradley
and others
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dennis Lee v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc., et al
as 15-60568
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS O'NEAL LEE
Defendant - Appellee:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INCORPORATED, CHRISTOPHER EPPS, Individual and official capacity, E. L. SPARKMAN, Individual and official capacity
and others
Ferguson v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv00261
Plaintiff:
James M. Ferguson
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections , Christopher Epps , Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chandler v. Wexford Health et al
as 4:2015cv00102
Plaintiff:
Joey Montell Chandler
Defendant:
Wexford Health, MDOC, Juan Santos
and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
