Cases 71 - 80 of 173
Evans v. Sparkman, et al.
as 4:2011cv00129
Plaintiff:
Ollie Lee Evans
Defendant:
Emmitt Sparkman, Christopher Epps and Timothy Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Gaskin v. Christopher Epps, et al
as 11-60673
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM LEWIS GASKIN
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER EPPS, in his individual and official capacities, RON WOODALL, in his individual and official capacities, JOHN DOE (MIKE), in his individual and official capacities and others
Wilson v. Epps et al
as 2:2011cv00191
Plaintiff:
Darnell Wilson
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Ron King, Robert Chamberlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. McAlexander et al
as 4:2011cv00104
Plaintiff:
Ira Lee Anderson, II
Defendant:
Preston McAlexander, Jennifer Carpenter, Heather Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rainey v. Epps et al
as 4:2011cv00091
Plaintiff:
Richard Rainey
Defendant:
Christopher Epps and Consuela Hayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Jones v. Christopher Epps, et al
as 11-60439
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES C. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER EPPS, E. L. SPARKMAN and DAVID PETRIE
James Jones v. Christopher Epps, et al
as 11-60437
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES C. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER EPPS, E. L. SPARKMAN and DAVID PETRIE
Dickson v. State of MS Dept. of Corrections et al
as 4:2011cv00067
Plaintiff:
Edward Dickson, Jr.
Defendant:
State of MS Dept. of Corrections and Christopher Epps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smart v. Miss. Dept of Corrections et al
as 4:2011cv00064
Plaintiff:
Daniel Smart
Defendant:
Miss. Dept of Corrections, Christopher Epps, E. L. Sparkman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peairs v. Epps et al
as 4:2010cv00163
Plaintiff:
Nathan Peairs
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Heinz Schafer, Dr. Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
