Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Hyde v. NSM Insurance Group
as 5:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hyde
Defendant:
NSM Insurance Group
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661 Family Medical Leave Act
HYDE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv25999
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER HYDE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HYDE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv60188
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER HYDE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carr v. Colon, et al
as 16-2099
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODOLFO CARR
Defendant:
WILLIAM COLON, KEVIN FOUNTAINE, LISA CASTOLDI and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MARLON MEDERO, PAMELA M. O'DELL and LT. KEEZER
Carr v. Colon, et al
as 14-2028
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODOLFO CARR
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM COLON, MARLON MEDERO, KEVIN FOUNTAINE and others
Defendant:
BONNIE WERNER, HAROLD W. CLARKE, LUIS SPENCER and others
Carr v. Colon, et al
as 13-1695
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODOLFO CARR
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM COLON, MARLON MEDERO, KEVIN FONTAINE and others
Defendant:
BONNIE WERNER, HAROLD W. CLARKE, LUIS SPENCER and others
Sabree v. Mendosa et al
as 1:2012cv11742
Plaintiff:
G Saif Sabree
Defendant:
Anthony Mendosa, Christopher Hyde, Pamela O'Dell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Spencer et al
as 1:2012cv10504
Plaintiff:
David Miller
Defendant:
Luis Spencer, Thomas Dickhaut and Christopher Hyde
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salameh v. Duval et al
as 1:2012cv10165
Plaintiff:
Nadeem Salameh
Defendant:
Ronald Duval, Luis Spencer, Thomas Dickhaut and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salameh v. Spencer et al
as 1:2011cv11950
Plaintiff:
Nadeem Salameh
Defendant:
Luis Spencer, Thomas Dickhaut, Osvaldo Vidal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
