Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Kelontae Carter v. Christopher LaRose
as 21-3536
Petitioner / Appellant:
KELONTAE CARTER
Respondent / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER LAROSE, Warden
In re: Bennie Adams, et al v. Richard Michael DeWine, et al
as 21-3330
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DOUGLAS L. COLEY, DENNY OBERMILLER, JASON ROBB and others
Intervenor / Appellee:
VON CLARK DAVIS, CALVIN MCKELTON, ASHFORD THOMPSON and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ANNETTE CHAMBERS-SMITH, Director, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections, EDWIN C. VOORHIES, JR., Managing Director of Operations, ODRC, MIKE DEWINE, Governor, State of Ohio and others
Plaintiff:
BENNIE ADAMS
Not Classified By Court:
In re: OHIO EXECUTION PROTOCOL LITIGATION
Ryan Gustafson v. CoreCivic, et al
as 20-3148
Defendant / Appellee:
CORECIVIC, NIELSA DIAZ, DANIEL BOND and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RYAN GUSTAFSON
Price Montgomery v. Maurice Ferentino, et al
as 20-3114
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFF DUTTON, ROBERT MACKLIN, TIMOTHY RUSH and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PRICE MONTGOMERY
Reginald Everson v. Christopher LaRose
as 19-4154
Petitioner / Appellant:
REGINALD EVERSON
Respondent / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER LAROSE, Warden
Stephen Thompson v. Christopher LaRose
as 19-4142
Petitioner / Appellant:
STEPHEN THOMPSON
Respondent / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER LAROSE, Warden
William Evans, Jr. v. Christopher LaRose, et al
as 19-4119
Defendant / Appellee:
NORTHEAST OHIO CORRECTIONAL CENTER, CORECIVIC, R. WYMAN, Security Threat Group Coordinator and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM H. EVANS, JR.
Reginald EversonIn re: Reginald Everson
as 19-4105
Respondent:
CHRISTOPHER LAROSE, Warden
Petitioner:
In re: REGINALD EVERSON
Ronald Johnson v. Christopher LaRose
as 19-4064
Petitioner / Appellant:
RONALD G. JOHNSON
Respondent / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER LAROSE, Warden
Thomas DiBiaseIn re: Thomas DiBiase
as 19-3946
Respondent:
CHRISTOPHER LAROSE
Petitioner:
In re: THOMAS C. DIBIASE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
