Cases 1 - 10 of 10
James v. Martuscello et al
as 1:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Jesse James
Defendant:
Daniel Martuscello, III, Anthony Annucci, Letitia James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Yehl
as 23-8099
Petitioner / Appellant:
RANDY WILLIAMS
Respondent / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER YEHL, Superintendent
St. John v. Yehl
as 6:2023cv06381
Petitioner:
Davon St. John
Respondent:
Christopher Yehl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Greene v. Yehl
as 1:2023cv01596
Petitioner:
Vashawn Greene
Respondent:
Christopher Yehl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moorer v. McCann et al
as 6:2023cv06040
Plaintiff:
DeVonte' Rashad Lee Moorer
Defendant:
Terrance McCann, Stephen Kokotajlo, Donald Lockwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz v. Donahue et al
as 6:2022cv06559
Plaintiff:
Frederick Diaz
Defendant:
James F. Donahue, Christopher Yehl, Timothy J. Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Yehl
as 6:2022cv06424
Petitioner:
Angemar Garcia
Respondent:
Christopher Yehl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stevenson et al v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision et al
as 1:2021cv00355
Defendant:
Craig Balcer, New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision (DOCCS), Thomas Sticht and others
Plaintiff:
David Stevenson and Leslie Stevenson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cole v. Nichols et al
as 6:2020cv06361
Plaintiff:
Antonio Cole
Defendant:
Elijah Nichols and Christopher Yehl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Occhipinti v. Annucci et al
as 6:2019cv06651
Defendant:
G. Mohring, M.D. H. U. Sheikh, Osbourne McKay and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Occhipinti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
