Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Jason Flakes v. James Schiebner, et al
as 13-2538
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON FLAKES
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES R. SCHIEBNER, Hearings Investigator/ARUS/Inspector, LAVERN SHARP, Deputy Warden, CINDI S. CURTIN, Warden and others
Jones #223008 v. Dawson et al

as 1:2011cv00081
Plaintiff:
Mark Jones #223008
Defendant:
B. Dawson, Cindi S. Curtin and Laura Bowers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frees #623134 v. Duby et al

as 1:2010cv00609
Plaintiff:
Gerald Frees #623134
Defendant:
Unknown Duby, Unknown Martin, Cindi S. Curtin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams #214930 v. Curtin et al

as 1:2010cv00364
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Williams #214930
Defendant:
Cindi S. Curtin, Barry Panzer, Donna Allmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGore #142739 v. Curtin et al

as 1:2010cv00257
Plaintiff:
Darryl McGore #142739
Defendant:
Cindi S. Curtin and Unknown Fuchette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flakes #407798 v. Van Gordon et al

as 1:2010cv00025
Plaintiff:
Jason Flakes #407798
Defendant:
Unknown Van Gordon, B. Bennett, Elizabeth Buren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darryl McGore v. Cindi Curtin
as 09-2303
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRYL MCGORE
Defendant - Appellee:
CINDI S. CURTIN
McGore #142739 v. Curtin et al

as 1:2009cv00820
Plaintiff:
Darryl McGore #142739
Defendant:
Cindi S. Curtin, Michael Curly, Unknown Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blake Joseph v. Cindi Curtin, et al

as 09-1616
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BLAKE JOSEPH
Defendant - Appellee:
CINDI S. CURTIN, Warden, ROBERT SHARP, Assistant Deputy Warden, sued in both capacities, MIKE HASKE, Resident Unit Manager, in both capacities and others
Michael Williams v. Cindi Curtin, et al

as 09-1381
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
CINDI S. CURTIN, et al.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.