Cases 1 - 10 of 47
CITIZENS BANK NA v. THOMPSON II et al
as 1:2025cv03739
Plaintiff:
CITIZENS BANK NA and RBS CITIZENS NA
Defendant:
JESSE THOMPSON II, XANTHIA THOMPSON and ADAMANT LIGHT MINISTRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Adam Bereki v. Citizens Bank NA et al
as 8:2024cv02509
Defendant:
MTC Financial Inc. doing business as Trustee Corps, Citizens Bank NA and Does 1-100
Plaintiff:
Adam Bereki
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02222
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Partners Alliance Corporation et al v. Ally Bank et al
as 3:2024cv01222
Defendant:
Capital One Financial Corporation, Citizens Bank, NA, Flagship Credit Acceptance LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Partners Alliance Corporation and Portfolio Services Limited, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 bc Removal- Breach of Contract
Citizens Bank, NA v. Abdur-Rahim Dudar
as 24-3314
Plaintiff:
CITIZENS BANK, NA
Defendant:
ABDUR-RAHIM DIB DUDAR
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION v. BRIDGES
as 2:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION
Defendant:
ROYAL A SMITH and RICHARD E. BRIDGES ESQ.
Interested Party:
CITIZENS BANK NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00507
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Zachary Neff v. Citizens Bank, NA
as 23-3780
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ZACHARY NEFF
Defendant / Appellee:
CITIZENS BANK, NA, oka Citizens Bank
Citizens Bank NA v. Dib Dudar
as 3:2023cv01819
Plaintiff:
Citizens Bank NA
Defendant:
Abdur-Rahim Dib Dudar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Kent Group Partners, LLC v. Citizens Bank, NA
as 23-3743
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENT GROUP PARTNERS, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
CITIZENS BANK, NA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
