Cases 21 - 30 of 33
United States of America et al v. Astrazeneca Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv01718
Defendant:
AstraZenca, L.P., AstraZeneca PLC, Astrazenca Pharmaceuticals, LP and others
Plaintiff:
New York State, States of California, Deleware, Connecticut,, The City of Chicago and others
Movant:
United States of America
Relator:
Allison Zayas
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
United States of America ex rel. JDJ & Associates LLP, et al. v. Natixis, et al.
as 1:2015cv05427
Plaintiff:
United States of America, JDJ & Associates LLP , State of New York and others
Defendant:
Natixis , Natixis Corporate & Investment Bank , Natixis Financial Products, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
United States of America, et al v. Dr. Reddy's Inc., et al
as 1:2013cv03779
Plaintiff:
United States of America , State of California , State of Delaware and others
Defendant:
Dr. Reddy's Inc. , Omnicare, Inc. and Neighborcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Retirement Board Of The Police v. The Bank of New York Mellon
as 13-1777
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Retirement Board Of The Policemen's Annuity and Benefit Fund Of The City Of Chicago, (on Behalf of Itself and Similarly Situated Certificate Holders), Westmoreland County Employee Retirement System, City of Grand Rapids General Retirement System and others
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
The Bank of New York Mellon
Retirement Board Of The Police v. The Bank of New York Mellon
as 13-1776
Plaintiff - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Retirement Board Of The Policemen's Annuity and Benefit Fund Of The City Of Chicago, on Behalf of Itself and Similarly Situated Certificate Holders, Westmoreland County Employee Retirement System, City of Grand Rapids General Retirement System and others
Defendant - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
The Bank of New York Mellon,, as Trustee Under Various Pooling and Servicing Agreements
Retirement Board Of The Police v. The Bank of New York Mellon
as 13-661
Petitioner-Cross-Respondent:
Retirement Board Of The Policemen's Annuity and Benefit Fund Of The City Of Chicago, (on Behalf of Itself and Similarly Situated Certificate Holders), Westmoreland County Employee Retirement System, City of Grand Rapids General Retirement System and others
Respondent-Cross-Petitioner:
The Bank of New York Mellon, (as Trustee Under Various Pooling and Servicing Agreements)
Retirement Board of the Police v. The Bank of New York Mellon
as 13-664
Petitioner-Cross-Respondent:
The Bank of New York Mellon, (as Trustee Under Various Pooling and Servicing Agreements)
Respondent-Cross-Petitioner:
Retirement Board Of The Policemen's Annuity and Benefit Fund Of The City Of Chicago, (on Behalf of Itself and Similarly Situated Certificate Holders), Westmoreland County Employee Retirement System, City of Grand Rapids General Retirement System and others
Policemen's Annuity and Benefit Fund Of The City Of Chicago v. Bank of America, NA et al
as 1:2012cv02865
Plaintiff:
Policemen's Annuity and Benefit Fund Of The City Of Chicago
Defendant:
Bank of America, NA and U.S. Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A/ IXO, v. CME Group Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv06697
Plaintiff:
Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO
Defendant:
CME Group Inc. , Bats trading, inc. , international securities exchange and others
Mediator:
Robert Faulkner
Counter_claimant:
Boston options exchange group llc , Board of trade of the city of chicago, inc. , CME Group Inc. and others
Counter_defendant:
Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. CME Group Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv06702
Plaintiff:
Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO
Defendant:
CME Group Inc. , Board of trade of the city of chicago, inc. , New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc. and others
Counter_claimant:
Boston options exchange group llc , Board of trade of the city of chicago, inc. , CME Group Inc. and others
Counter_defendant:
Realtime Data, LLC D/B/A IXO
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
