Cases 31 - 40 of 6,374
Adams v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv02029
Plaintiff:
Robert Christopher Adams and Miles
Defendant:
John Doe, Tom Dart and City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Giles v. City of Chicago
as 1:2024cv01994
Plaintiff:
Steve Terrell Giles
Defendant:
City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mahal v. City Of Chicago
as 1:2024cv01835
Plaintiff:
Tamara Mahal
Defendant:
City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01777
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Pini-Hernandez v. The City of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv01775
Plaintiff:
Angela Pini-Hernandez
Defendant:
The City of Chicago and R. Kimble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Helene Miller v. Carol Howard, et al
as 24-1314
Plaintiff:
HELENE TONIQUE LAURENT MILLER, also known as Helene-Tonique Laurent Miller-Williams
Defendant:
CAROL M. HOWARD, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, CITY OF CHICAGO, a municipal corporation and others
Herbst v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv01679
Plaintiff:
Bradley Andrew Herbst
Defendant:
City Of Chicago and Fraternal Order of Police Lodge 7
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Polk v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv01572
Plaintiff:
Sherrif Polk
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, City Of Chicago Department Of Police and John Korolis, Star No. 21339
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Tinajero v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv01598
Plaintiff:
Jose Tinajero
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Reynaldo Guevara, Ernest Halvorsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Diggs v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv01546
Plaintiff:
Glenn Diggs
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Christopher Parker, Derrick Martin Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
