Cases 41 - 50 of 6,374
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2024cv01458
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Brisco
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Jason Vogler, Don De Vito and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Polewski v. The City of Chicago
as 1:2024cv01432
Plaintiff:
Stephen A. Polewski
Defendant:
The City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01431
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Ceballos v. Home Depot USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01398
Plaintiff:
Florencio Ceballos
Defendant:
Home Depot USA, Inc., Universal Protection Service, LLC, City of Chicago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01394
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Williams v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv01396
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Nicholas Evangelides, Dale Potter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01322
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Valverde v. Carcamo #1692 et al
as 1:2024cv01134
Plaintiff:
Estate of Isidro Valverde
Defendant:
Jose Carcamo #1692, Jorge Ulloa # 13936 and City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Adams v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv01124
Plaintiff:
Robert Christopher Adams and Miles
Defendant:
City of Chicago, John Doe, Director to get names of Doctor's and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
