Cases 61 - 70 of 6,374
Shedrick Bowes-Northern v. City of Chicago, et al
as 24-1112
Plaintiff:
SHEDRICK BOWES-NORTHERN
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, JOEL GORDILS, #8451 Chicago Police Officer and others
Bradley v. Birdsong et al
as 1:2024cv00587
Plaintiff:
Deandre Bradley
Defendant:
Birdsong, Jane Doe, White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Whitley et al
as 1:2024cv00561
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
William Whitley and The City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv00563
Plaintiff:
Janeen Brown
Defendant:
City of Chicago, M Lopez and C McCoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Danahy et al v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv00449
Plaintiff:
Thomas Danahy, Kimberly M Danahy, Jason Black and others
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO, Chicago Department of Water Management and City of Chicago Department of Water Billings and Collections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Holmes v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv00465
Plaintiff:
Larry Holmes
Defendant:
City of Chicago, David Hodgeman, B. J. Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Miller v. Gonzalez et al
as 1:2024cv00383
Plaintiff:
Roxanne K Miller
Defendant:
Ivan Gonzalez, Ioan Nemes, Eric Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv00581
Plaintiff:
Markeas D. Brown
Defendant:
City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
De Avila v. Murphy et al
as 1:2024cv00400
Plaintiff:
Jamie de Avila
Defendant:
Timothy Murphy and City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
