Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Gordon v. Neugebauer et al
as 1:2014cv00093
Defendant:
Randy Neugebauer, Abilene Police Department , TX - Taylor County and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Russell Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00400
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cass et al v. City of Abilene et al
as 1:2013cv00177
Plaintiff:
Tammy Cass , Marcus Cass , Matthew Cass and others
Defendant:
City of Abilene, Stan Standridge and Chris Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox v. The City of Abilene et al
as 1:2013cv00062
Plaintiff:
Kyle Chandler Cox
Defendant:
The City of Abilene, The Abilene Police Department, J Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00152
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Woodyard, et al v. The City of Abilene, Texas, et al
as 1:2011cv00229
Plaintiff:
Clayton Woodyard and Marnie Woodyard
Defendant:
The City of Abilene, Texas, Roger Romero, Christopher Bryan Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zena Crenshaw-Logal v. City of Abilene, Texa
as 11-10264
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ZENA D. CRENSHAW-LOGAL
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF ABILENE TEXAS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Crenshaw-Logal v. City of Abilene, Texas
as 1:2010cv00132
Plaintiff:
Zena D Crenshaw-Logal
Defendant:
City of Abilene, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. City of Abilene, Texas et al
as 1:2009cv00203
Plaintiff:
Craig Nelson Baldwin White
Defendant:
City of Abilene, Texas and Unknown Officers and Dispatchers of the Abilene Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
