Cases 1 - 10 of 13
City of Anniston Alabama v. Purdue Pharma L P et al
as 1:2018op45329
Plaintiff:
City of Anniston Alabama
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma L.P., Purdue Pharma, Inc., Purdue Frederick Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
City of Anniston Alabama v. Purdue Pharma L P et al
as ALN/1:18-cv-00398
Plaintiff:
City of Anniston Alabama
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma L P , Purdue Pharma, Inc. , The Purdue Frederick Company, Inc. and others
City of Anniston Alabama v. Purdue Pharma L P et al
as 1:2018cv00398
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Endo Health Solutions, Inc., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
City of Anniston Alabama
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Doggrell v. City of Anniston Alabama et al
as 1:2016cv00239
Plaintiff:
Josh Doggrell
Defendant:
City of Anniston Alabama and Brian Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benjamin Little v. Robert Dean, Jr., et al
as 14-14556
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BENJAMIN LITTLE
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT J. DEAN, JR., individual and official capacity, DON A. HOYT, individual and official capacity, TANA BRYANT, individual and official capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Vines v. McGrady et al
as 1:2014cv00351
Plaintiff:
Robin Vines
Defendant:
Layton McGrady, Murphy, Warren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spain v. Hoyt et al
as 1:2013cv02014
Plaintiff:
John Spain
Defendant:
Don A. Hoyt, Layton McGrady and City of Anniston, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Little v. Dean et al
as 1:2013cv00165
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Little
Defendant:
Robert J Dean, Jr , Don A. Hoyt , Tana Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. Steketee et al
as 1:2012cv02105
Plaintiff:
John Carter Thomas
Defendant:
Nick Steketee and City of Anniston, Alabama, the
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
