Cases 11 - 20 of 26
The State of Tennessee, et al v. Robert Irvin
as 13-6421
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THE STATE OF TENNESSEE, MONTGOMERY COUNTY, TENNESSEE, CITY OF CLARKSVILLE, TENNESSEE and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERT THOMAS IRVIN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00907
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Marsha Lilly v. City of Clarksville, Tennessee, et al
as 12-5661
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARSHA LILLY
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CLARKSVILLE, TENNESSEE, AL ANSLEY, Chief of Police for the City of Clarksville, Tennessee and PHIL ASHBY, Police Officer of the City of Clarksville, Tennessee
Sherlock v. The City of Clarksville, Tennessee et al
as 3:2011cv01048
Plaintiff:
Stephen Sherlock
Defendant:
The City of Clarksville, Tennessee and John Piper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00986
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Rye v. City of Clarksville, Tennessee
as 3:2010cv01221
Plaintiff:
Judy Rye
Defendant:
City of Clarksville, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lilly v. City of Clarksville, Tennessee et al
as 3:2010cv01178
Plaintiff:
Marsha Lilly
Defendant:
City of Clarksville, Tennessee, Al Ansley and Phil Ashby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cassandra Williams v. City of Clarksville, Tennessee, et al
as 10-5763
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CASSANDRA L. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CLARKSVILLE, TENNESSEE and NICK NEWMAN, Detective
Williams v. City of Clarksville, Tennessee et al
as 3:2010cv00462
Plaintiff:
Cassandra L. Williams
Defendant:
City of Clarksville, Tennessee and Nick Newman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. City of Clarksville, Tennessee et al
as 3:2010mc00056
Plaintiff:
Cassandra L. Williams
Defendant:
City of Clarksville, Tennessee and Nick Newman
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
