Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Fortiori v. City of Houston, Texas
as 4:2025cv01793
Plaintiff:
Patriccus Fortiori
Defendant:
City of Houston,Texas, a government agency
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Chhim v. City of Houston
as 24-20469
Defendant:
City of Houston, Human Resources-Public Works, Rayford O. Irvin, Michael Lightner and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Chhim
Overshown-Nunez v. City of Houston, Texas et al
as 4:2024cv02455
Defendant:
HOUSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT and City of Houston, Texas
Plaintiff:
ANIDA OVERSHOWN-NUNEZ
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Chhim v. City Of Houston et al
as 4:2023cv04850
Plaintiff:
Joseph Chhim
Defendant:
City Of Houston, Equal Employment Opportunity Commision, Rayford O Irvin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Kabouni v. City of Houston
as 4:2023cv01364
Plaintiff:
JAY KABOUNI
Defendant:
City Of Houston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Marbley v. City of Houston
as 22-20451
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joshua Marbley
Defendant / Appellee:
City of Houston, Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County and First Transit, Incorporated
Marbley v. City Of Houston et al
as 4:2022cv01367
Plaintiff:
Joshua Marbley
Defendant:
City Of Houston, Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County and First Transit, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Owen v. City of Houston
as 5:2019cv01492
Plaintiff:
Richard Mays Owen and Estate of Marsha Long Owen
Defendant:
City of Houston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
FILING ERROR
as 1:2019cv01232
Plaintiff:
Marsha Long Owen, Richard Mays Owen and Estate of Marsha Long Owen
Defendant:
City of Houston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Salazar v. City Of Houston
as 4:2019cv03411
Plaintiff:
Christina Salazar
Defendant:
City Of Houston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
