Cases 1 - 10 of 70
Briggs v. City of Pittsburg
as 3:2024cv07165
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Lynn Briggs
Defendant:
City of Pittsburg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Porter et al v. City of Pittsburg et al
as 3:2024cv03179
Plaintiff:
Ashton Porter and Gianna Porter
Defendant:
Ernesto Mejia-Orozco, City of Pittsburg, William Hatcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tallie v. Pittsburg Police Department, et al
as 23-3000
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH N. TALLIE
Defendant / Appellee:
PITTSBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT, ADAN NANCE, LORI BOLTON-FLEMING and others
Tuning v. City of Walnut Creek et al
as 3:2021cv05154
Plaintiff:
Sarah Tuning
Defendant:
City of Walnut Creek, City of Martinez, City of Pleasant Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. City of Pittsburg et al
as 4:2021cv03820
Plaintiff:
Earl Davis
Defendant:
Dillon Tindall and City of Pittsburg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
E.P. v. City of Pittsburg et al
as 3:2021cv03030
Plaintiff:
E.P. and Chanel Hoskins
Defendant:
Officer Lee Borman, City of Pittsburg, Does 1-30 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Malott v. City of Walnut Creek et al
as 3:2021cv01674
Defendant:
City of Walnut Creek, Jay Hill, Will Appel and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Malott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. City of Pittsburg et al
as 3:2020cv07129
Plaintiff:
Richard Johnson
Defendant:
City of Pittsburg and DOE Pittsburg Police Officers 1-25
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Terrance Amons, et al v. Dillon Tindle, et al
as 20-16351
Defendant / Appellant:
DILLON TINDLE, Officer and JESUS ARELLANO, Officer
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TERRELL AMONS, TERRANCE AMONS and SANDRA TALBERT
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURG
Banks v. Pittsburg Police Department et al
as 4:2020cv00932
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Pittsburg Police Department, City of Pittsburg, Chief, Pittsburg Bureau of Police and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
