Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Wolanyk v. City of Portland, Oregon et al
as 3:2023cv01349
Plaintiff:
Samuel Patrick Wolanyk and Beach Time, LLC
Defendant:
City of Portland, Oregon, Rebecca Esau and Lee Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
City of Portland, Oregon v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 3:2022cv07045
Plaintiff:
City of Portland, Oregon
Defendant:
McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
City of Portland, Oregon v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 3:2022cv01648
Plaintiff:
City of Portland, Oregon
Defendant:
McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Johnson v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2022cv00867
Plaintiff:
Alexandra Johnson
Defendant:
City of Portland, Oregon, Multnomah County Multnomah County, John Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv02067
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
City of Boston, et al v. FCC, et al
as 20-72749
Petitioner:
CITY OF PIEDMONT, California, HOWARD COUNTY, Maryland, CITY OF GAITHERSBURG, Maryland and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Rosenblum v. John Does 1-10 et al
as 3:2020cv01161
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Marshals Service, United States Customs and Border Protection Service and others
Plaintiff:
Ellen Rosenblum
Amicus Curiae:
City of Portland, Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Hall et al v. City of Portland, Oregon et al
as 3:2020cv00431
Defendant:
Spencer Perry, City of Portland, Oregon, Portland Police Bureau and others
Plaintiff:
Debra Hall and Leo Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayberry v. City of Portland, Oregon et al
as 3:2019cv01704
Defendant:
City of Portland, Oregon, Maliqhe Griffith, Does 1 through 50 and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Mayberry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
City of Portland, Oregon, et al v. USA, et al
as 19-72391
Petitioner:
SACRAMENTO METROPOLITAN CABLE TELEVISION COMMISSION, MT. HOOD CABLE REGULATORY COMMISSION, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA and others
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
