Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Solomon v. Gentile et al.
as 4:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
LaJena Solomon
Defendant:
Robert Gentile, Hannah Short and City of Youngstown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ortiz et al. v. City of Youngstown et al.
as 4:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Heriberto Gierbonlini Ortiz and Wanda Diaz
Defendant:
City of Youngstown, Tyl Srbinovich and Ivan Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kalan v. City of Youngstown
as 4:2023cv01654
Plaintiff:
Frank M. Kalan
Defendant:
City of Youngstown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
U.S. Specialty Insurance Company v. City of Youngstown, et al
as 4:2022cv00749
Plaintiff:
U.S. Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
City of Youngstown and Cheryl Durig
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Wesley v. City of Youngstown et al
as 4:2022cv00201
Plaintiff:
Lynette Wesley
Defendant:
City of Youngstown, Chad Zubal, Malik Mostella and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Two Bridges, LLC v. City of Youngstown
as 4:2020cv02759
Plaintiff:
Two Bridges, LLC
Defendant:
City of Youngstown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. The City of Youngstown et al
as 4:2020cv00579
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Sophisticated Lady, LLC, Officer Daniel Spivey and others
Plaintiff:
R. W. and LaDawnda Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jacks v. City of Youngstown
as 4:2019cv02689
Plaintiff:
John E. Jacks
Defendant:
City of Youngstown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
City of Youngstown v. Actavis Pharma, Inc. et al
as 1:2019op45722
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Endo Health Solutions, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
City of Youngstown
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Filing Error
as 4:2019cv01919
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Endo Health Solutions, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
City of Youngstown
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
