Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Joshua Walthour v. Middle Georgia Family Rehab LLC, et al
as 24-14102
Defendant:
MIDDLE GEORGIA FAMILY REHAB LLC, BRENDA G. HICKS and CLARENCE HICKS
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and STATE OF GEORGIA
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA WALTHOUR
Hicks v. Capital One Bank et al

as 1:2024cv00623
Plaintiff:
Clarence Hicks, Jr.
Defendant:
Capital One Bank, Encore Capital Group, Inc. and Midland Credit Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
HICKS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv09245
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE HICKS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hicks et al v. Wells Fargo Bank
as 1:2023cv00428
Plaintiff:
Clarence Hicks and Sparrow Mercantile, LLC
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Joshua Walthour v. USA, et al
as 22-12189
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOSHUA WALTHOUR, United States of America and The State of Georgia, ex rel
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and STATE OF GEORGIA
Defendant / Appellant:
MIDDLE GEORGIA FAMILY REHAB LLC, BRENDA G. HICKS, a.k.a. Brenda Taylor and CLARENCE HICKS
Hicks v. Warden

as 1:2017cv01563
Plaintiff:
Clarence Hicks
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hicks v. Warden

as 3:2016cv02476
Petitioner:
Clarence Hicks
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant

as 3:2016cv01515
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant

as 1:2016cv02608
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
US v. Clarence Hick

as 14-7795
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CLARENCE HICKS, a/k/a Bunky
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.