Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Herndon #136007 v. Sices et al
as 1:2021cv00966
Plaintiff:
Clarence Watson Herndon #136007
Defendant:
Unknown Sices and Unknown Sossomon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herndon #136007 v. Michigan Department of Corrections
as 1:2021cv00475
Plaintiff:
Clarence Watson Herndon #136007
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herndon #136007 v. Traylor et al
as 1:2021cv00470
Plaintiff:
Clarence Watson Herndon #136007
Defendant:
John Davids, David Maranka and C. Traylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herndon #136007 v. Bucholtz
as 1:2021cv00471
Petitioner:
Clarence Watson Herndon #136007
Defendant:
Carrie Bucholtz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herndon #136007 v. Davids et al
as 1:2021cv00458
Defendant:
Adam Yuhas, John Davids and E. Simon
Plaintiff:
Clarence Watson Herndon #136007
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herndon #136007 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv01091
Defendant:
Nicole Doolittle, Joanne Bridgford, Brooke Oversmith and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence Watson Herndon #136007
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WATSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv96483
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE WATSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Herndon #136007 v. Michigan Department of Corrections
as 1:2020cv00192
Plaintiff:
Clarence Watson Herndon #136007
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ABDUR-RAHMAN et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv01187
Plaintiff:
STEVEN JIMENEZ, WILLIAM DEARMITT, SHANE HUNTER and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Abdur-Rahman et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv00976
Plaintiff:
Steven Jimenez, William Dearmitt, Shane Hunter and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
