Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Weller, MD v. Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai et al
as 1:2023cv04775
Plaintiff:
Alexander S. Weller, MD
Defendant:
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Kathy Navid, MD, Dennis Charney, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sanders v. Williams et al
as 4:2021cv02614
Plaintiff:
Dennis Sanders
Defendant:
Charles Williams, Stanley Terry, Clarissa Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darrell Goss v. Bryan Stirling
as 20-7835
Defendant / Appellee:
CANTEEN MANAGER GEORGIA YELDELL, BRYAN P. STIRLING, JENNIFER FRANKLIN, Mailroom Director and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARRELL L. GOSS
Goss, Sr. v. Larry et al
as 2:2020cv02978
Defendant:
James C. Dean, Williemary Scott, Johnny Rich and others
Plaintiff:
Darrell L. Goss, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nathaniel Simmons v. Charles Williams
as 19-6989
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHELLE CHAMBERS, a/k/a Michelle Chamber, STEPHANIE MARSHALL, BELL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHANIEL SIMMONS
Brown v. Stirling et al
as 5:2019cv00435
Defendant:
Stanley Terry, Kennard Dubose, Joseph McFadden and others
Plaintiff:
Vincent Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sadler v. Williams et al
as 8:2019cv00333
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Charles Williams, Stanley Terry and others
Plaintiff:
Kinjta Kadeem Sadler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rucker v. Stirling et al
as 1:2019cv00310
Defendant:
Stanley Terry, Kennard Dubose, Charles Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Rucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. Williams et al
as 0:2019cv00317
Defendant:
Michelle Chambers, Tim E. Rogers, Bryan P. Stirlings and others
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Feaster v. Stirling et al
as 5:2019cv00296
Defendant:
Victoria Norman, Kennard Dubose, Charles Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Jason D Feaster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
