Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02797
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
ANNETTE v. HASLAM et al
as 3:2018cv01299
Defendant:
Scott Hull, JOHN WHITWORTH, ROBBIE BEAL and others
Plaintiff:
HOLLIE ANNETTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0701
Harris v. Abe Garden at Park Manor
as 3:2011cv01173
Plaintiff:
Claudia A. Harris
Defendant:
Abe Garden at Park Manor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Rios-Quiroz et al v. Williamson County, Tennessee
as 3:2011cv01168
Plaintiff:
Claudia Rios-Quiroz , Fernando Ruiz-Espinosa , Alvarado-Dealmonte and others
Defendant:
Williamson County, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v City of Germantown, TN
as 2:2011cv02607
Plaintiff:
Sherra Robinson Wright
Defendant:
City of Collierville, Tennessee, City of Collierville Police Department, City of Germantown, Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AREVALO et al v. MARTINEZ et al
as 2:2011cv02339
Plaintiff:
NUVIA AREVALO , RAUL GONZALEZ , RUBEN GUEVARA and others
Defendant:
UMHP PROPERTIES INC, UMH SALES AND FINANCE and GAIL WHITTEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Houston v. Memphis Mental Health Institute et al
as 2:2010cv02679
Plaintiff:
Carla Houston
Defendant:
Memphis Mental Health Institute, Family Counseling, CSA'S and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Featherson v. Bredesen et al
as 2:2010cv02196
Plaintiff:
Anthony Featherson
Defendant:
Phil Bredesen, Curtis Person, Claudia Halton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bateman et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2008cv01186
Plaintiff:
Rodger Bateman, Shannon Byrd, Bendick Brorson and others
Defendant:
United States of America, Beth Nunnick, Nancy Hale and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
