Cases 11 - 20 of 103
Starr Technical Risks Agency, Inc. et al v. Clearon Corp.
as 2:2022cv00032
Plaintiff:
Starr Technical Risks Agency, Inc. and Optima Chemical Group LLC
Defendant:
Clearon Corp.
Petitioner:
Tina L. Gillenwater and John Mark Gillenwater, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Kabasi v. Clearone Advantage, LLC
as 1:2021cv00388
Plaintiff:
Katherine Kabasi
Defendant:
ClearOne Advantage, LLC doing business as ClearOne Financial
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wave Linx LLC v. Clearone, Inc.
as 1:2021cv01507
Plaintiff:
Wave Linx LLC
Defendant:
Clearone, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 1
ClearOne v. PathPartner Technology PVT
as 2:2021cv00362
Defendant:
PathPartner Technology PVT, PathPartner Technology Pvt Ltd and PathPartner Technology
Plaintiff:
ClearOne
Doheny Enterprises Inc v. Clearon Corporation
as 2:2021cv00438
Defendant:
Clearon Corporation
Plaintiff:
Doheny Enterprises Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
ClearOne, Inc. v. Shure Acquisition Holdings
as 21-1517
Appellee:
SHURE ACQUISITION HOLDINGS, INC.
Appellant:
CLEARONE, INC.
Shure Incorporated v. ClearOne, Inc.
as 21-1024
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHURE INCORPORATED
Defendant / Appellee:
CLEARONE, INC.
ClearOne v. Chiang, et al
as 20-4108
Defendant:
LONNY BOWERS, WIDEBAND SOLUTIONS, INC., a Massachusetts corporation, JUN YANG, an individual and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CLEARONE, INC., FKA ClearOne Communications, Inc., a Utah corporation
Interested Party:
DONALD BOWERS
Intervenor:
DAVID SULLIVAN
ClearOne v. Chiang, et al
as 20-4105
Defendant:
LONNY BOWERS, WIDEBAND SOLUTIONS, INC., a Massachusetts corporation, JUN YANG, an individual and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CLEARONE, INC., FKA ClearOne Communications, Inc., a Utah corporation
Interested Party:
DONALD BOWERS
Intervenor:
DAVID SULLIVAN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02562
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
