Cases 61 - 70 of 103
ClearOne Communications v. GN U.S. et al
as 2:2011cv00695
Plaintiff:
ClearOne Communications
Defendant:
GN U.S. and GN Netcom A/S
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
ClearOne Communications, Inc. v. Bowers (Donald)
as 10-4196
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CLEARONE COMMUNICATIONS, INC., a Utah corporation
:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv14258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
ClearOne Communications, Inc. v. Biamp Systems, et al
as 10-4168
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CLEARONE COMMUNICATIONS, INC., a Utah corporation
Defendant - Appellant:
BIAMP SYSTEMS, an Oregon corporation
Defendant:
ANDREW CHIANG, an individual, JUN YANG, an individual, LONNY BOWERS and others
:
ClearOne Communications, Inc. v. Chiang (Donald Bowers appeal), et al
as 10-4152
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CLEARONE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Defendant:
ANDREW CHIANG, JUN YANG, LONNY BOWERS and others
Third Party - Appellant:
DONALD BOWERS
ClearOne Communications v. Biamp Systems, et al
as 10-4090
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CLEARONE COMMUNICATIONS, INC., a Utah corporation
Defendant - Appellant:
BIAMP SYSTEMS, an Oregon corporation
Defendant:
ANDREW CHIANG, JUN YANG, WIDEBAND SOLUTIONS, a Massachusetts corporation and others
ClearOne Communications, Inc. v. Yang, et al
as 10-4087
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CLEARONE COMMUNICATIONS, INC., a Utah corporation
Defendant - Appellant:
JUN YANG, WIDEBAND SOLUTIONS, a Massachusetts corporation, VERSATILE DSP, a Massachusetts corporation and others
Defendant:
BIAMP SYSTEMS, an Oregon corporation
Party In Interest - Appellant:
DONALD BOWERS
Gotch v. Clearone Communications Inc
as 3:2010mc00045
Plaintiff:
Robert Gotch
Defendant:
Clearone Communications Inc
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Zenick v. Clearone Communications Inc
as 3:2010mc00044
Plaintiff:
Mark Zenick
Defendant:
Clearone Communications Inc
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
