Cases 21 - 30 of 7,002
Fantel, Jr. v. FBI et al
as 1:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
Clifford John Fantel, Jr.
Defendant:
FBI, Caitlin Isherwood and Mark Trovato
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Doe v. Harris et al
as 2:2024cv02604
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Clifford Harris and Tameka Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
NEWREZ LLC v. MORNEAU
as 1:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
NEWREZ LLC doing business as SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE SERVICING
Defendant:
CLIFFORD R MORNEAU
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNIVERSITY CREDIT UNION, SCARLETT DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00720
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Range v. Mayfield et al
as 7:2024cv02263
Plaintiff:
Branchaunn Range
Defendant:
Clifford Mayfield, Martin George Palmer, David Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLIFFORD v. WARDEN RACHEL THOMPSON, FCI - FT. DIX
as 1:2024cv00870
Petitioner:
STEPHEN FRANCIS CLIFFORD
Respondent:
WARDEN RACHEL THOMPSON, FCI - FT. DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dwayne Davis v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 24-1238
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE DAVIS, aka Dwayne Davis-El
Defendant:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, MDOC Director, in their personal capacity, LES PARISH, Warden, in their personal capacity, THOMAS P. MACKIE, Former Warden, in their personal capacity and others
Boland v. LaVoie et al
as 2:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
Clifford James Boland
Defendant:
Daniel LaVoie and Jamie Barker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02353
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
