Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C. v. 2.46 Acres in Dickson County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv00483
Plaintiff:
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C.
Defendant:
2.46 Acres in Dickson County, Tennessee, Donald L. Mixon, Willadean Ridley and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Pike v. Helton et al
as 3:2022cv00537
Plaintiff:
Christa Pike
Defendant:
Lisa Helton, Lee Dotson, Gloria Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baskin-Robbins Franchising, LLC et al v. Anglin et al
as 3:2019cv00500
Defendant:
Clifford L. Moody and Brandon G. Anglin
Plaintiff:
BR IP Holder LLC and Baskin-Robbins Franchising, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01566
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor et al v. Marlin
as 3:2015cv00674
Plaintiff:
Clifford Taylor, Jr. , Tanya Taylor , Elizabeth Sullivan and others
Defendant:
Raleigh Marlin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
McCormack et al v. Evridge et al
as 3:2014cv00095
Plaintiff:
Stacie McCormack and Kenneth McCormack
Defendant:
Clifford Evridge and Silica Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Burgess v. Lester
as 3:2014cv00015
Petitioner:
Clifford Eric Burgess
Respondent:
Jerry Lester
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Patton v. Helton et al
as 1:2012cv00030
Plaintiff:
Kenny Patton
Defendant:
Kyle Helton, Barry Medley, Theresa Mattox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wolfe et al v. Alexander et al
as 3:2011cv00751
Plaintiff:
Tony Wolfe, Robert Barnes, Robert Davis and others
Defendant:
Paul Alexander, Monique Taylor, Debra Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keller v. Ray et al
as 3:2010cv00503
Plaintiff:
Clifford Keller
Defendant:
Gayle Ray, Ricky Bell, Dale Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
