Cases 1 - 10 of 137
Gayton v. State
as 5:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Clifford James Gayton
Defendant:
State
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Fischer et al v. Hofmann et al
as 4:2023cv00659
Defendant:
Alejandra Gamino, Ivan T. Hofmann, Ronald R. Trombetta and others
Plaintiff:
Gail Corder Fischer and Clifford Fischer & Company
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Clifford P Turner v. U.S. Marshalls Office Service
as 1:2023cv00153
Petitioner:
Clifford Pollard Turner
Respondent:
U.S. Marshalls Office Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Turner v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 6:2023cv00018
Plaintiff:
Clifford P Turner
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fountain v. Thomas et al
as 6:2022cv00431
Plaintiff:
Brett Fountain
Defendant:
Clifford Wayne Thomas, Wood County Criminal District Attorney's Office and Angela Lea Albers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Clark v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2022cv00131
Plaintiff:
Clifford Clark
Defendant:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2022cv00134
Plaintiff:
Clifford Clark
Defendant:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2022cv00132
Plaintiff:
Clifford Clark
Defendant:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2022cv00133
Plaintiff:
Clifford Clark
Defendant:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
