Cases 1 - 10 of 126
Martin v. Wallace
as 25-547
Petitioner:
ROBERT E. MARTIN
Respondent:
JANINE WALLACE, Director Coalinga State Hospital
Sharp v. Coalinga State Hospital

as 3:2024cv02168
Defendant:
Coalinga State Hospital
Petitioner:
Anthony A Sharp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sharp v. Coalinga State Hospital

as 3:2024cv08009
Respondent:
Coalinga State Hospital
Petitioner:
Anthony A. Sharp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Azevedo v. Coalinga State Hospital

as 2:2024cv02957
Defendant:
Coalinga State Hospital
Plaintiff:
Alex Leonard Azevedo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Azevedo v. Coalinga State Hospital

as 1:2024cv01345
Plaintiff:
Alex Leonard Azevedo
Defendant:
Coalinga State Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vernon C. Brown, Jr. v. Coaling State Hospital

as 2:2024cv06102
Respondent:
Coalinga State Hospital
Petitioner:
Vernon C. Brown, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Sims v. Coalinga State Hospital et al

as 1:2024cv00433
Plaintiff:
Robert Sims
Defendant:
Coalinga State Hospital and Sara V. Centeno
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02249
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Chaka D. Gilbert v. Coalinga State Hospital

as 5:2023cv01954
Petitioner:
Chaka D. Gilbert
Respondent:
Coalinga State Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chaka D. Gilbert v. Coalinga State Hospital
as 5:2023cv01795
Petitioner:
Chaka D. Gilbert
Respondent:
Coalinga State Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.