Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Alholm v. Cochlear Americas et al
as 1:2024cv02303
Plaintiff:
Daniel Alhorn
Defendant:
Cochlear Americas and Cochlear Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
University of Pittsburgh -- Of the Commonwealth System of Higher Education v. Cochlear Limited et al
as 6:2021cv00986
Plaintiff:
University of Pittsburgh -- Of the Commonwealth System of Higher Education
Defendant:
Cochlear Limited, Cochlear Americas and Cochlear Clinical Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Hastings v. Cochlear Limited et al
as 2:2021cv00428
Defendant:
Cochlear Americas Corporation and Cochlear Limited
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Hastings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Oticon Medical AB v. Cochlear Limited
as 21-1448
Appellant:
OTICON MEDICAL AB, WILLIAM DEMANT HOLDING A/S and OTICON MEDICAL LLC
Appellee:
COCHLEAR LIMITED
Moore v. Cochlear Limited et al
as 1:2020cv00753
Plaintiff:
Melissa Moore
Defendant:
Cochlear Limited and Cochlear Americas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Koublani v. Cochlear Limited et. al.
as 2:2020cv01741
Plaintiff:
Shafigheh Koublani
Defendant:
Cochlear Limited and Cochlear Americas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Alexander v. Cochlear Limited et al
as 4:2018cv00498
Plaintiff:
Donald K. Alexander
Defendant:
Cochlear Limited and Cochlear Americas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pawlik v. Cochlear Limited et al
as 1:2017cv08260
Plaintiff:
Pamela Pawlik
Defendant:
Cochlear Limited and Cochlear Americas Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Malka et al v. Cochlear Limited et al
as 1:2017cv07223
Plaintiff:
Malka Mandel and Moshe Mandel
Defendant:
Cochlear Limited and Cochlear Americas Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KEGLEY v. COCHLEAR LIMITED et al
as 7:2017cv00086
Defendant:
COCHLEAR AMERICAS CORPORATION and COCHLEAR LIMITED
Plaintiff:
COURTNEY KAYLENE KEGLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
