Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Boyce A. Stringer et al v. American Biltrite, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv09813
Defendant: DOMCO PRODUCTS TEXAS, INC., Individually and as Successor-In-Interest to, and formerly known as DOMCO INC., FLOOR PRODUCTS (TEXAS), AZROCK INDUSTRIES INC., UVALDE ROCK ASPHALT COMPANY, REDCO CORPORATION, formerly known as CRANE CO., Individually and as Successor-In-Interest to COCHRANE CORPORATION, AMERICAN BILTRITE INC. and others
Plaintiff: Boyce Stringer, Nancy Stringer, Boyce A. Stringer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation
Matey v. Crane Co., et al
as 8:2022cv00841
Plaintiff: Irma Matey and Richard D. Matey
Defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Crane Co. and others
Not Classified By Court: Jonathan Hollingshead
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Talarczyk et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 8:2022cv00836
Plaintiff: FRANCIS TALARCZYK and WANDA ALGARIN TALARCZYK
Defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, ALFA LAVAL INC., THE DELAVAL SEPARATOR COMPANY and others
Not Classified By Court: Jonathan C. Hollinshead
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Edmonds v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 8:2022cv00825
Plaintiff: ARNOLD EDMONDS
Defendant: AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, BUFFALO PUMPS, INC., ALFA LAVAL INC. and others
Not Classified By Court: Jonathan Hollingshead
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
EDMONDS v. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION et al
as 8:2022cv00824
Plaintiff: ARNOLD EDMONDS
Defendant: AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, ALFA LAVAL INC., THE DELAVAL SEPARATOR COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Chauvin v. ABB, Inc., et al
as 2:2022cv00696
Plaintiff: Ronald J. Chauvin
Defendant: ABB, Inc., individually and as successor-in-interest to Bailey Controls and ITE Imperial Company f/k/a ITE Circuit Breaker Company, AK Steel Corporation, as successor-in-interest to National Supply, Albert L. Bossier, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Murphy v. Air Liquid Systems Inc, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00519
Defendant: ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS, as successor-by-merger to WHITE CONSOLDATED INDUSTRIES, as successor-by-merger to COPES VULCAN, INC., GARDNER DENVER, INC., ALFA LAVAL, INC. and others
Plaintiff: Timothy Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Sibley v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv07697
Plaintiff: Christopher George Sibley and Maria Sibley
Defendant: Blackmer Pump Company, EATON CORPORATION individually and sii to Vickers Pump;, VIKING PUMP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Farris et al v. 3M Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2018cv04186
Defendant: IMO INDUSTRIES, INC. (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to DELAVAL TURBINE, INC.), BORGWARNER MORSE TEC LLC individually and as successor-in-interest, parent, alter ego and equitable trustee of BORG-WARNER CORPORATION, VIGOR INDUSTRIAL LLC (individually and as successor-in-interest to TODD SHIPYARD CORPORATION) and others
Plaintiff: MELVA FARRIS and GARY FARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Sandra Coulbourn v. Crane Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-16925
Plaintiff - Appellee: SANDRA BROWN COULBOURN, surviving wife and on behalf of decedent's surviving beneficiaries George Coulbourn Jr, Scott Alan Coulbourn and Shannon Coulbourn Moses
Defendant - Appellant: CRANE COMPANY, sued individually and as: successor in interest Cochrane Corporation successor in interest Chapman Valve Company successor in interest Deming Pump Company

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?