Cases 21 - 30 of 53
Denby v. Garcia
as 22-40189
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Donis Lemond Denby
Defendant / Appellee:
FNU Garcia, Senior Warden TDCJ Coffield Unit, FNU Delapp, Associate Warden TDCJ Coffield Unit, FNU Lane, Assistant Warden TDCJ Coffield Unit and others
Green v. Lumpkin
as 22-40148
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Louis Ray Green
Defendant / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Kenneth M. Putnam, Warden, Coffield Unit, Pamela Pace, University of Texas Medical Branch Medical Care Pracitce Manager, Coffield Unit and others
Jackson v. Coffield Unit et al
as 6:2021cv00498
Plaintiff:
David Jackson
Defendant:
Coffield Unit and Ellis Unit Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Coffield Unit et al
as 9:2021cv00303
Plaintiff:
David Jackson
Defendant:
Coffield Unit and Ellis Unit Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russell v. Coffield Unit
as 3:2021cv00420
Plaintiff:
Patrick Gene Russell
Defendant:
Coffield Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sturgeon v. Coffield Unit
as 6:2020cv00489
Defendant:
Coffield Unit
Plaintiff:
Dexter Sturgeon, Jr
Consolidated Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roderick Bonner v. Pam Pace, et al
as 20-40424
Defendant / Appellee:
UTMB, GAYE KARRIKER, Law Librarian, PAM PACE, UTMB Medical Director and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RODERICK L. BONNER
Sturgeon v. Coffield Unit
as 3:2020cv01931
Defendant:
Coffield Unit
Plaintiff:
Dexter Sturgeon, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv03053
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Sterns v. Jeff Catoe, et al
as 19-40712
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFF CATOE, Warden - TDCJ Coffield Unit, DEANNA R. FRANCES, Classification - TDCJ Coffield Unit and CARL MCKELLAR, Region II Assistant Regional Director
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT J. STERNS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
