Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Dixon v. Chaplin et al
as 2:2009cv01724
Plaintiff:
Derek Dixon, II
Defendant:
Chaplin, Cool, Cole Morrow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. Morrow et al
as 2:2009cv01725
Plaintiff:
Derek Dixon, II
Defendant:
Cole Morrow, Jim Henson and HDSP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. Henson et al
as 2:2009cv01707
Plaintiff:
Derek Dixon, II
Defendant:
Jim Henson and Cole Morrow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. Morrow et al
as 2:2009cv01730
Plaintiff:
Derek Dixon, II
Defendant:
Cole Morrow, Jim Henson and High Desert State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. HDSP Mailroom Staff et al
as 2:2009cv01712
Plaintiff:
Derek Dixon, II
Defendant:
HDSP Mailroom Staff, Cole Morrow and Jim Henson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. HDSP Maintenance Department et al
as 2:2009cv01709
Plaintiff:
Derek Dixon, II
Defendant:
HDSP Maintenance Department, M. Dooley, Cole Morrow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. Garcia et al
as 2:2009cv01713
Plaintiff:
Derek Dixon, II
Defendant:
Genesa Garcia, Cole Morrow, Jim Henson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. High Desert State Prison et al
as 2:2009cv01705
Plaintiff:
Derek Dixon, II
Defendant:
High Desert State Prison, Cole Morrow and Jim Henson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. High Desert State Prison et al
as 2:2009cv01736
Plaintiff:
Derek Dixon, II
Defendant:
High Desert State Prison, Jim Henson and Cole Morrow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. Doloway et al
as 2:2009cv01645
Plaintiff:
Derek Dixon, II
Defendant:
Doloway, William Kuloloia, Jim Henson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
