Cases 1 - 10 of 149
Antwoyn Spencer v. DOJ, et al
as 25-5086
Plaintiff:
Antwoyn Terrell Spencer
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Pamela Bondi, United States Attorney General, Colette S. Peters, Director, United States Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Lamont Fitch v. J. Doerer et al
as 2:2025cv02505
Plaintiff:
Lamont Fitch
Defendant:
Warden J. Doerer, David M. Singer, United States Marshal, Colette S. Peters and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Scott Lykens v. Colette Peters, et al
as 25-1393
Plaintiff:
SCOTT LYKENS
Defendant:
COLETTE S. PETERS, JAMES PERTRUCCI, STEPHEN SPAULDING and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2025cv00650
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Williams v. Peters et al
as 5:2025cv00114
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bernard Williams, Jr
Defendant:
Colette S. Peters, Shannon D. Withers, J. Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2025hc02037
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2025hc02033
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Aguilar v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2025cv00208
Plaintiff:
Oscar Contreras Aguilar
Defendant:
Federal Bureau (of) Prisons, Colette S. Peters, D. Christensen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Manuel Jackson v. David Singer et al
as 2:2025cv00727
Plaintiff:
Manuel Jackson
Defendant:
Colette S Peters and David M. Singer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Darnell Moon v. Christopher Gomez
as 25-1078
Plaintiff:
DARNELL WESLY MOON
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER GOMEZ, CARLOS MARTINEZ, MICHAEL D. FRAZIER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
