Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Fidelity National Financial, et al v. Colin Friedman, et al
as 17-15913
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, INC., a Delaware corporation and FIDELITY EXPRESS NETWORK, INC., a California corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
COLIN H. FRIEDMAN, individually and as trustee of Friedman Family trust UDT Dated 7/23/87, HEDY KRAMER FRIEDMAN, individually and as trustee of Friedman Family trust UDT Dated 7/23/87, FARID MESHKATAI, an individual and others
Fidelity National Financial, I, et al v. Colin Friedman, et al
as 13-15954
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, INC., a Delaware corporation and FIDELITY EXPRESS NETWORK, INC., a California corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
COLIN H. FRIEDMAN, individually and as trustee of Friedman Family trust UDT Dated 7/23/87, HEDY KRAMER FRIEDMAN, individually and as trustee of Friedman Family trust UDT Dated 7/23/87, FARID MESHKATAI, an individual and others
Fidelity National Financial Incorporated et al v. Friedman et al
as 2:2011mc00072
Plaintiff:
Fidelity National Financial Incorporated and Fidelity Express Network Incorporated
Defendant:
Colin H Friedman , Hedy Kramer Friedman , Farid Meshkatai and others
Counter_claimant:
Farid Meshkatai , Anita Kramer Meshkatai , Colin H Friedman and others
Counter_defendant:
Fidelity National Financial Incorporated and Fidelity Express Network Incorporated
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Fidelity National Financial Inc et al v. Friedman et al
as 2:2011mc00072
Plaintiff:
Fidelity National Financial Inc and Fidelity Express Network Inc
Defendant:
Colin H Friedman, Hedy Kramer Friedman, Farid Meshkatai and others
Counter_claimant:
Farid Meshkatai, Anita Kramer Meshkatai, Colin H Friedman and others
Counter_defendant:
Fidelity National Financial Inc and Fidelity Express Network Inc
Fidelity National Financial, et al v. Colin Friedman, et al
as 10-56728
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, INC., a Delaware corporation, AKA Seal 1 and FIDELITY EXPRESS NETWORK, INC., a California corporation, AKA Seal 2
Defendant - Appellee:
COLIN H. FRIEDMAN, individually and as trustee of the Friedman Family Trust UDT, dated July 23, 1987, AKA Seal B, HEDY KRAMER FRIEDMAN, individually and as trustee of the Friedman Family Trust UDT, dated July 23, 1987, AKA Seal C, FARID MESHKATAI, an individual, AKA Seal D and others
Fidelity National Financial, I, et al v. Colin Friedman, et al
as 10-56148
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, INC., a Delaware corporation, AKA Seal 1 and FIDELITY EXPRESS NETWORK, INC., a California corporation, AKA Seal 2
Defendant - Appellee:
COLIN H. FRIEDMAN, individually and as trustee of the Friedman Family Trust UDT, dated July 23, 1987, AKA Seal B, HEDY KRAMER FRIEDMAN, individually and as trustee of the Friedman Family Trust UDT, dated July 23, 1987, AKA Seal C, FARID MESHKATAI, an individual, AKA Seal D and others
Fidelity National Financial In v. Colin Friedman., et al
as 08-16967
Plaintiff - Appellee:
FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL INC.
Claimant - Appellee:
FIDELITY EXPRESS NETWORK INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
COLIN H. FRIEDMAN and HEDY KRAMER FRIEDMAN, individually and as trustee of the Friedman Family Trust UDT, dated July 23, 1987
Defendant:
ANITA MESHKATAI, individually and as a trustee of the Anita Kramer Living Trust, dated July 23, 1987
Fidelity National Financial In, et al v. Allen Hyman, et al
as 08-56038
Plaintiff - Appellee:
FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL INC., a Delaware corporation and FIDELITY EXPRESS NETWORK INC., a California corporation
Defendant:
COLIN H. FRIEDMAN, individually
Defendant - Appellant:
ALLEN HYMAN
Fidelity National Financial, Inc. et al v. Friedman et al
as 1:2007mi00030
Plaintiff:
Fidelity National Financial, Inc. and Fidelity Express Network, Inc.
Defendant:
Colin H. Friedman, Hedy Kramer Friedman, Farid Meshkatai and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1963 Registration of judgment from another district
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
