Cases 1 - 9 of 9
MANGUS v. COLOPLAST CORPORATION et al
as 3:2018cv00149
Defendant:
MENTOR WORLDWIDE LLC, COLOPLAST CORPORATION and COLOPLAST MANUFACTURING US, LLC
Plaintiff:
DENISE MANGUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KERCHNER v. COLOPLAST CORPORATION et al
as 5:2018cv01408
Plaintiff:
CHARLEYNE KERCHNER
Defendant:
COLOPLAST CORPORATION and COLOPLAST MANUFACTURING US, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MOULTRIE et al v. COLOPLAST CORPORATION et al
as 2:2018cv00231
Defendant:
COLOPLAST CORPORATION, MENTOR WORLDWIDE, LLC and COLOPLAST MANUFACTURING US, LLC
Plaintiff:
CHERYL MOULTRIE and PETER MOULTRIE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCHRECENGOST et al v. COLOPLAST CORPORATION et al
as 3:2017cv00220
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH SCHRECENGOST and ROGER SCHRECENGOST
Defendant:
COLOPLAST CORPORATION and COLOPLAST MANUFACTURING US, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOWLEN v. COLOPLAST A/S et al
as 2:2017cv01372
Plaintiff:
THOMAS BOWLEN
Defendant:
COLOPLAST A/S, COLOPLAST MANUFACTURING, US, LLC , COLOPLAST CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCHRECENGOST et al v. COLOPLAST CORPORATION et al
as 2:2017cv03939
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH SCHRECENGOST and ROGER SCHRECENGOST
Defendant:
COLOPLAST CORPORATION , MENTOR WORLDWIDE, LLC and COLOPLAST MANUFACTURING US, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MANGUS v. COLOPLAST CORPORATION et al
as 2:2017cv03686
Plaintiff:
DENISE MANGUS
Defendant:
COLOPLAST CORPORATION, MENTOR WORLDWIDE, LLC and COLOPLAST MANUFACTURING US, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WEAKLAND v. COVIDIEN, INC et al
as 2:2013cv00997
Plaintiff:
SALLY WEAKLAND
Defendant:
COVIDIEN, INC, ETHICON, INC., GYNECARE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
STARKS v. COLOPLAST CORPORATION
as 2:2013cv03872
Plaintiff:
JOHN STARKS
Defendant:
COLOPLAST CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
