Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Brown v. Phelps et al
as 1:2021cv00491
Petitioner:
Marshall Brown
Respondent:
Warden Robert May, Commissioner Perry Phelps and Attorney General of State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Darrell LawIn re: Darrell Law
as 20-2208
Respondent:
UNKNOWN DOCTOR, MEDICAL PROVIDER HOLLIS, MEDICAL GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE and others
Petitioner:
In re: DARRELL LAW
Michaels v. Commissioner Perry Phelps et al
as 1:2019cv01735
Defendant:
Warden David Pierce, Warden Robert May, Deputy Warden James Scarborough and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Michaels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shankaras v. Commissioner Perry Phelps et al
as 1:2019cv01737
Defendant:
Warden David Pierce, Warden Robert May, Deputy Warden James Scarborough and others
Plaintiff:
Roman Shankaras
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
El-Quadeer v. Commissioner Perry Phelps et al
as 1:2019cv01736
Plaintiff:
Abdul Haqq El-Quadeer
Defendant:
Warden David Pierce, Warden Robert May, Deputy Warden James Scarborough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ayers v. Commissioner Perry Phelps et al
as 1:2019cv01738
Defendant:
Warden David Pierce, Warden Robert May, Deputy Warden James Scarborough and others
Plaintiff:
Jarreau A. Ayers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paul Fahmy v. Department of Corrections, et al
as 19-2516
Defendant:
LT. BURMAN, RN IRENE FUH, RN ERIC NEBA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL A. FAHMY
Darrell Law v. David Pierce, et al
as 19-2474
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN DANA METZGER, COMMISSIONER PERRY PHELPS and WARDEN DAVID PIERCE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARRELL LAW
Law v. Pierce et al
as 1:2019cv00924
Defendant:
Commissioner Perry Phelps, Warden David Pierce and Warden Dana Metzger
Plaintiff:
Darrell Law
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
London v. Evans et al
as 1:2019cv00559
Plaintiff:
Kamilla Denise London
Defendant:
Commissioner Perry Phelps, Shane Troxler, Lt. Justin Atherholt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
