Cases 1 - 10 of 3,391
Hebert v. COMMISIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 6:2024cv00499
Plaintiff:
Huey Hebert
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Grant v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
Samantha Grant
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
General Counsel SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Madlock v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
Carlos E. Madlock
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
General Counsel SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Flores v. O'Malley
as 24-30242
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Flores
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Gardner v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv00887
Plaintiff:
Melanie Shanee Gardner
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Cross v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Charles Cross, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Reed v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00483
Plaintiff:
Barbara Reed
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Kerns v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Jason Ryan Kerns
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Walters v. O'Malley
as 24-40225
Plaintiff:
Alice Ruth Walters
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Palmer v. O'Malley
as 24-50263
Plaintiff:
Robert Alan Palmer
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
