Cases 1 - 10 of 12
USA, et al v. Google LLC
as 24-5006
Plaintiff:
United States of America, State of Arkansas, State of Florida and others
Defendant:
Google LLC
Other:
Brad Greenspan
STATE OF COLORADO et al v. GOOGLE LLC
as 1:2020cv03715
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF NEBRASKA and others
Defendant:
GOOGLE LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. GOOGLE LLC
as 1:2020cv03010
Plaintiff:
STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant:
GOOGLE LLC
Not Classified By Court:
STATE OF MICHIGAN and STATE OF CALIFORNIA
3Rd Party Defendant:
NBCUNIVERSAL MEDIA, LLC, COMCAST CORPORATION and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Petitioner:
AMAZON.COM, INC., APPLE INC., DUCK DUCK GO, INC. and others
Respondent:
BOOKING HOLDINGS INC. and YELP INC.
Interested Party:
STATE OF WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Ricardo Lopez v. State of California, et al
as 19-7051
Defendant / Appellee:
Los Angeles County Registrar Recorder Office, Franchise Tax Board, State of California and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ricardo Jose Calderon Lopez, doing business as Starlight Consulting Services, doing business as Starlight Communications, doing business as Starlight Entertainment Enterprises, Inc., doing business as Starlight Music Management, Inc.
LOPEZ v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al
as 1:2019cv01139
Defendant:
FRANCHISE TAX BOARD, OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Plaintiff:
RICARDO JOSE CALDERON LOPEZ and RICARDO JOSE CALDERON LOPEZ doing business as STARLIGHT CONSULTING SERVICES doing business as STARLIGHT COMMUNICATIONS doing business as STARLIGHT ENTERTAINMENT ENTERPRISES, INC. doing business as STARLIGHT MUSIC MANAGEMENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. AT&T INC. et al
as 1:2011cv01560
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA , STATE OF OHIO and others
Defendant:
AT&T INC. , T-MOBILE USA, INC. and DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG
Movant:
GOOGLE INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
RICHARDSON et al v. AZKO NOBEL, INC.
as 1:2009cv02112
Defendant:
MITSUBISHI TANABE PHARMA CORPORATION, CHINOOK GLOBAL LIMITED, EVONIK DEGUSSA GMBH and others
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, KIRK CHAFFEE, STATE OF MINNESOTA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Rambus Incorporated v. FTC
as 07-1086
Petitioner:
Rambus Incorporated
Respondent:
Federal Trade Commission
Amicus Curiae:
S. M. Oliva
Amicus Curiae For Respondent:
Samsung Electronics Company, Ltd., JEDEC Solid State Technology Association, State of Ohio and others
Movant-Amicus Curiae For Respondent:
Hewlett Packard Co., Cisco Systems Inc., Sun Microsystems, Inc. and others
Puerto Rico Ports v. FMC, et al
as 06-1407
Petitioner:
Puerto Rico Ports Authority
Respondent:
Federal Maritime Commission and United States of America
Intervenor:
Odyssea Stevedoring of Puerto Rico, Inc. and International Shipping Agency, Incorporated
Amicus Curiae For Petitioner:
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
STATE OF OHIO et al v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CO
as 1:2002cv01080
Plaintiff:
STATE OF OHIO, STATE OF MARYLAND, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CO
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
