Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Holton et al v. Ten Palms LLC et al
as 2:2015cv01119
Defendant:
Coastal Luxury Management, LLC, Conexis Benefit Administrators, LP, Conexis, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Max Holton, Wesley Holton and Hilary Lee
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Borovac v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
as 8:2015cv00196
Plaintiff:
Paul Borovac
Defendant:
Conexis Benefits Administrators, LP and National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Thorson v. Aviall Services Inc et al
as 3:2015cv00571
Plaintiff:
Don Thorson
Defendant:
Aviall Services Inc and Conexis Benefits Administrators LP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Borovac v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, et al
as 8:2014cv00361
Plaintiff:
Paul Borovac
Defendant:
Conexis Benefits Administrators, LP and National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States of America v. Howard et al
as 3:2012cv01514
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
James Edwin Howard
Garnishee:
Conexis Benefits Administrators LP
Cause Of Action: Application for a Writ of Garnishment
Honey et al v. Dignity Health et al
as 2:2012cv00416
Defendant:
Conexis Benefit Administrators LP, Conexis, LLC, Dignity Health and others
Plaintiff:
Adam D Honey and Regina C. Honey
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Seitz v. The Animal Foundation et al
as 2:2011cv01558
Defendant:
Conexis Benefit Administrators, LP, Conexis, LC and The Animal Foundation
Plaintiff:
James Seitz
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Raymond v. National Tour, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv00388
Plaintiff:
Patricia A. Raymond
Defendant:
National Tour, Inc., Johnny Capels, Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
