Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Amos Financial LLC v. Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation
as 1:2023cv03010
Plaintiff:
Amos Financial LLC
Defendant:
Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640 Indian Tribal Rights
Confederated Tribes and Bands of The Yakama Nation v. Orth et al
as 1:2022cv03127
Plaintiff:
Confederated Tribes and Bands of The Yakama Nation
Defendant:
Peter Orth, Yakima County, Yakima County Coroner's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maverick Gaming LLC v. United States of America et al
as 3:2022cv05325
Plaintiff:
Maverick Gaming LLC
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Department of the Interior, Deb Haaland and others
Intervenor:
Shoalwater Bay Tribe
Amicus Curiae:
Suquamish Tribe, Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation, Hoh Indian Tribe and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Washington et al v. Russell Vought et al
as 2:2021cv00002
Plaintiff:
Association Of King County Historical Organizations, State of Washington, Central Council of the Tlingit and Haida Indian Tribes of Alaska and others
Defendant:
National Archives and Records Administration, Emily W. Murphy, Office of Management and Budget and others
Amicus Curiae:
Fred T. Korematsu Center for Law and Equality and Historians
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation v. City of Yakima
as 1:2020cv03156
Plaintiff:
The Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation and Confederated Tribes and Bands of The Yakama Nation
Defendant:
Yakima City of and City of Yakima
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9606
BNSF Railway Company, et al v. Columbia River Commission, et al
as 20-35390
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
FRIENDS OF THE COLUMBIA GORGE, INC. and COLUMBIA RIVER GORGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
RICHARD DAVIAU, in his official capacity as County Planner of Clark County, KEVIN A. PRIDEMORE, in his official capacity as Code Enforcement Coordinator of Clark County, CLARK COUNTY, Washington and others
Plaintiff:
CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS OF THE YAKAMA NATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY
BNSF Railway Company, et al v. Friends of the Columbia Gorge,, et al
as 20-35205
Defendant:
RICHARD DAVIAU, in his official capacity as County Planner of Clark County, KEVIN A. PRIDEMORE, in his official capacity as Code Enforcement Coordinator of Clark County, CLARK COUNTY, Washington and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
COLUMBIA RIVER GORGE COMMISSION and FRIENDS OF THE COLUMBIA GORGE, INC.
Plaintiff:
CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS OF THE YAKAMA NATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY
NEIGHBORS AGAINST BISON SLAUGHTER et al v. NATIONAL PARK SERVICE et al
as 1:2019cv00128
Plaintiff:
NEIGHBORS AGAINST BISON SLAUGHTER and BONNIE LYNN
Amicus Curiae:
Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes, CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS OF THE YAKAMA NATION, CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE UMATILLA INDIAN RESERVATION and others
Defendant:
Sonny Perdue, David Bernhardt, USDA FOREST SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Confederated Tribes and Bands v. Klickitat County, et al
as 19-35821
Defendant / Appellant:
KLICKITAT COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF THE PROSECUTING ATTORNEY, an agency of Klickitat County, KLICKITAT COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, KLICKITAT COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE, an agency of Klickitat County and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS OF THE YAKAMA NATION, a sovereign federally recognized Native Nation
Tribes of The Yakama Nation v. Klickitat County, et al
as 19-35807
Defendant / Appellee:
KLICKITAT COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, KLICKITAT COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE, an agency of Klickitat County, BOB SONGER, in his official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS OF THE YAKAMA NATION, a sovereign federally recognized Native Nation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
