Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 41
CITIZENS FOR PENNSYLVANIA'S FUTURE v. CONFLUENCE BOROUGH MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY
as 3:2014cv00100
Plaintiff: CITIZENS FOR PENNSYLVANIA'S FUTURE
Defendant: CONFLUENCE BOROUGH MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Confluence v. The Cannon Corporation
as 4:2014cv00166
Defendant: The Cannon Corporation
Plaintiff: Confluence
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
CONFLUENCE STRATEGY PARTNERS, LLC v. CARDELL CABINETRY, LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv01333
Plaintiff: CONFLUENCE STRATEGY PARTNERS, LLC
Defendant: CARDELL CABINETRY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. Confluence Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv01342
Plaintiff: Broadcast Music, Inc., Songs of Universal, Inc., Benny Bird Company, Inc and others
Defendant: Confluence Enterprises, Inc. and Richard David
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Oberlin v. Confluence Technologies, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00299
Plaintiff: Angela Oberlin and Angela Oberlin
Defendant: Confluence Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract Plaintiff
Confluence International, Inc. v. Mukasey et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2008cv02665
Plaintiff: Confluence International, Inc.
Defendant: Michael Mukasey , United States Department of Justice , Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Confluence International, Inc. v. U.S. Citizenship etc.
as 08-1822
Petitioner: Confluence International, Inc.
Respondent: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Inc.
Waterborne Sales, Inc. v. Confluence Watersports
as 0:2007cv04271
Plaintiff: Waterborne Sales, Inc. and Waterborne Sales, Inc.
Defendant: Confluence Watersports
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Confluence Metropolitan District et al v. East West Resort Development XIV, L.P., L.L.L.P. et al
as 1:2007cv00947
Petitioner: Confluence Metropolitan District, Confluence Metropolitan District, Confluence Metropolitan District and others
Respondent: East West Resort Development XIV, L.P., L.L.L.P., Union Pacific Railroad Company, Union Pacific Railroad Company and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 10101 Rail Transportation
OLD TOWN CANOE V CONFLUENCE HOLDING
as 05-1148
Defendant/Cross Appellant: CONFLUENCE HOLDINGS CORP.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?