Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Johnson v. Hoover et al
as 3:2022cv00090
Plaintiff:
Lausteveion Johnson
Defendant:
Laurie Hoover, Michaela Garufalo, Ed Gary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clay v. Bisbee et al
as 3:2020cv00122
Defendant:
Nevada Parole Commissioners, Bisbee, Monterde and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie Bernard Clay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2019cv00841
Defendant:
Adam Endel, Warden Brian Williams, Michael Keeler and others
Plaintiff:
Camille Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owens v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2019cv00126
Defendant:
Adam Endel, E. K. McDenniel, Michael Keeler and others
Plaintiff:
Keshone Owens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Nevada Board of Parole et al
as 2:2018cv01525
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Adam Endel, Maurice Silva and others
Plaintiff:
Raul M Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Towles v. Bisbee et al
as 3:2018cv00036
Defendant:
Connie Bisbee, Chief of Nevada Department of Parole & Probation, Chistopher Derrico and others
Plaintiff:
Dee V. Towles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Bishop v. Alexander et al
as 3:2018cv00030
Defendant:
Sean Alexander, Connie Bisbee, Jane Fossbinder and others
Plaintiff:
Derick Bishop
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Bisbee et al
as 3:2017cv00677
Defendant:
Connie Bisbee, Tony Corda, Adam Endel and others
Plaintiff:
David Jonathan Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Castillo v. Bisbee et al
as 3:2017cv00617
Defendant:
Connie Bisbee, Susan Jackson, Michael Keller and others
Plaintiff:
Ismael Castillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2017cv00606
Defendant:
Connie Bisbee, Nevada Board of Parole Commissioners and State of Nevada
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
