Cases 41 - 50 of 65
Anderson v. Bisbee

as 3:2015cv00465
Plaintiff:
Jesse Anderson
Defendant:
Connie Bisbee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reese v. Clark County Detention Center et al

as 2:2015cv01633
Defendant:
John Billage, Connie Bisbee, Miss Caulderwood and others
Plaintiff:
James M. Reese
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Rimer v. Sandoval et al

as 3:2015cv00105
Defendant:
Connie Bisbee, Board of Parole Commissioners, Carson, County of and others
Plaintiff:
Stanley Rimer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tripp v. Bisbee et al

as 3:2015cv00030
Defendant:
Connie Bisbee, Tony Corda, Adam Endel and others
Plaintiff:
Walter Tripp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gray v. Cox et al

as 2:2015cv00069
Defendant:
Connie Bisbee, Greg Cox, D. Neven and others
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Gray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simons v. Nevada Board of Parole Commissioners et al

as 3:2014cv00652
Defendant:
Connie Bisbee, Tony Corda, Susan Jackson and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Simons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Erler v. Connie Bisbee, et al

as 14-16981
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT ERLER
Defendant - Appellee:
CONNIE BISBEE, MICHAEL KEELER, MAURICE SILVA and others
Erler v. Bisbee et al

as 3:2014cv00340
Defendant:
Connie Bisbee, Tony Corda, Adam Endel and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Erler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Misiewicz v. Bisbee et al
as 2:2013cv02127
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada, Connie Bisbee and D. W. Neven
Petitioner:
William Misiewicz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. State of Nevada et al

as 3:2013cv00559
Defendant:
Connie Bisbee, Curtis Cole, Catherine Cortez-Masto and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick S. Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.