Cases 41 - 50 of 412
Vickery McCray v. Connie Horton
as 21-1685
Petitioner / Appellant:
VICKERY J. MCCRAY
Respondent / Appellee:
CONNIE HORTON, Warden
Kalvin Washington v. Richard Sanchez, et al
as 21-1735
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KALVIN LAMAR WASHINGTON
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD SANCHEZ, SUZANNE STRAUTZ, OAKLAND COUNTY PROSECUTOR and others
Nesto #419888 v. Horton
as 2:2021cv00225
Petitioner:
Rodger Nesto #419888
Respondent:
Connie Horton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jermaine StevensonIn re: Jermaine Stevenson
as 21-1763
Petitioner:
In re: JERMAINE STEVENSON
Respondent:
CONNIE HORTON, Warden
Resch #304507 v. Rink et al
as 2:2021cv00227
Plaintiff:
Brandon Marcus Resch #304507
Defendant:
David Rink, Kelly M. Wellman, Connie Horton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kalvin Washington v. Lori Dawson, et al
as 21-1607
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KALVIN LAMAR WASHINGTON
Defendant / Appellee:
LORI DAWSON, Prosecutor Wayne County, MI, individually and in their official capacity, DAVID G. GORCYCA, Prosecutor Oakland County, MI, individually and in their official capacity, RICHARD D. KUHN, Judge Oakland County, MI, individually and in their official capacity and others
Dorian Willis v. Connie Horton
as 21-1661
Petitioner / Appellant:
DORIAN WILLIS
Respondent / Appellee:
CONNIE HORTON, Warden
Armour #327656 v. Horton et al
as 2:2021cv00204
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Orese-Charles Armour #327656
Defendant:
Connie Horton, Nelson Duncan, Unknown Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caleb Mackey v. Connie Horton
as 21-2961
Petitioner / Appellant:
CALEB NUQUAY MACKEY
Respondent / Appellee:
CONNIE HORTON, Warden
Daquan Hass v. Connie Horton, et al
as 21-2876
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAQUAN WILLIE HASS
Defendant / Appellee:
CONNIE HORTON, Warden, ACTING DEPUTY WARDEN MILLER, J. CORRIGAN, Acting Deputy Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
