Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Yi Shao v. John Roberts, Jr., et al
as 22-15857
Plaintiff / Appellant:
YI TAI SHAO, AKA Linda Yi Tai Shao
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN G. ROBERTS, Jr., ANTHONY M. KENNEDY, STEPHEN G. BREYER and others
(PS) Shao v. Roberts, et al.
as 2:2022cv00325
Plaintiff:
Yi Tai Shao and Linda Shao
Defendant:
John G. Roberts, Jr., Anthony M. Kennedy, Stephen Breyer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Yi Tai Shao v. John Roberts, et al
as 21-5210
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Yi Tai Shao
Defendant / Appellee:
John G. Roberts, Chief Justice, Anthony M. Kennedy, Associate Justice, Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice and others
Yi Tai Shao v. John Roberts, et al
as 19-5014
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Supreme Court, Rice Pichon, BJ Fadem and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Yi Tai Shao, Esquire, Attorney and Yi Tai Shao
SHAO v. KENNEDY et al
as 1:2018cv01233
Plaintiff:
YI TAI SHAO
Defendant:
JOHN G. ROBERTS, ANTHONY M. KENNEDY, CLARENCE THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-17119
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv04377
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Gilbert Marosi v. Conrad Rushing, et al
as 14-16040
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GILBERT MAROSI
Defendant - Appellee:
CONRAD RUSHING, Presiding Justice Sixth District Court of Appeals, EUGENE M. PREMO, NATHAN D. MIHARA, Associate Justice and others
Gilbert Marosi v. Conrad Rushing, et al
as 14-16040
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GILBERT MAROSI
Defendant / Appellee:
CONRAD RUSHING, Presiding Justice Sixth District Court of Appeals, EUGENE M. PREMO, NATHAN D. MIHARA, Associate Justice and others
Marosi v. Rushing et al
as 3:2013cv05198
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Marosi
Defendant:
Conrad Rushing, Eugene M Premo, Nathan D. Mihara and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
