Cases 1 - 10 of 227
Center for Biological Diversity, et al v. Gina Raimondo, et al
as 24-5071
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity, Defenders of Wildlife and Conservation Law Foundation, 18-cv-00283-JEB
Defendant:
Gina M. Raimondo, Secretary of the Department of Commerce and Janet Coit, in her official capacity as Assistant Administrator of NOAA Fisheries
Intervenor:
Maine Lobstermen's Association, Massachusetts Lobstermen's Association, State of Maine and others
Massachusetts Lobsterman's Association, Inc. v. National Marine Fisheries Service, et al
as 24-1220
Plaintiff:
MASSACHUSETTS LOBSTERMAN'S ASSOCIATION, INC.
Defendant:
NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, GINA M. RAIMONDO, Secretary, in her official capacity and JANET COIT, Assistant Administrator, in her official capacity
Appellant:
RICHARD MAXIMUS STRAHAN
Interested Party:
CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION, INC., CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE and others
Massachusetts Lobstermen's Association, Inc. v. National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) et al
as 1:2024cv10332
Plaintiff:
Massachusetts Lobstermen's Association, Inc.
Defendant:
National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), Gina Raimondo and Janet Coit
Amicus Curiae:
Pro Se Party Richard Strahan, Conservation Law Foundation, Center for Biological Diversity and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Sierra Club, Inc., et al v. Granite Shore Power LLC, et al
as 24-1041
Plaintiff:
SIERRA CLUB, INC. and CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION, INC.
Defendant:
GRANITE SHORE POWER LLC, GSP MERRIMACK LLC and PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, d/b/a Eversource Energy
Conservation Law Foundation, Inc. v. Academy Express, LLC, et al
as 23-1832
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
DPV TRANSPORTATION, INC., BOSTON CHARTER BUS, LLC and ACADEMY EXPRESS, LLC
Defendant:
ACADEMY BUS, LLC, WYNN RESORTS, LTD., WYNN MA, LLC and others
Conservation Law Foundation Inc. v. Twin Rivers Technologies Holdings Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv11858
Plaintiff:
Conservation Law Foundation Inc.
Defendant:
Twin Rivers Technologies Holdings Inc. and Twin Rivers Technologies Manufacturing Corporation
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
MASSACHUSETTS LOBSTERMEN'S ASSOCIATION, INC. v. NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE et al
as 1:2023cv00293
Plaintiff:
MASSACHUSETTS LOBSTERMEN'S ASSOCIATION, INC.
Defendant:
NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, GINA RAIMONDO, JANET COIT and others
Intervenor Defendant:
CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Conservation Law Foundation, Inc. v. Durham School Services, L.P. et al
as 1:2022cv11992
Plaintiff:
Conservation Law Foundation, Inc.
Defendant:
Durham School Services, L.P., Durham Holding II, L.L.C. and National Express, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604 Clear Air Act (Emission Standards)
Conservation Law Foundation, Inc. et al v. Regan et al
as 1:2022cv11863
Plaintiff:
Conservation Law Foundation, Inc. and Charles River Watershed Association, Inc.
Defendant:
Michael S Regan, David W Cash and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Maritime Subsidy Board
Maine Lobstermen's Association v. National Marine Fisheries Service, et al
as 22-5246
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Maine Lobstermen's Association
Not Yet Classified:
State of Maine Department of Marine Resources, District 4 Lodge of the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, Local Lodge 207 and Massachusetts Lobstermen's Association
Defendant / Appellee:
National Marine Fisheries Service, Gina Raimondo, in her official capacity as Secretary of Commerce and Janet Coit, in her official capacity as Assistant Administrator for Fisheries
Intervenor / Appellee:
Conservation Law Foundation, Center for Biological Diversity and Defenders of Wildlife
Amicus Curiae:
State of New Hampshire and Maine State Chamber of Commerce
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
