Cases 1 - 10 of 389
Sanchez II v. Corizon Inc. et al
as 8:2023cv02377
Plaintiff:
Henry Sanchez II
Defendant:
Corizon Inc., Yes Care, Mrs. Wheatley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mark White v. Corizon, Inc., et al
as 23-1283
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK EARL WHITE
Defendant / Appellee:
CORIZON, INC., DOCTOR RICKEY J. COLEMAN, Acting Chief Medical Officer, DOCTOR PETER E. SICES and others
Defendant:
AETNA LIFE AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, KRISTIE BADDER, E. COE HILL and others
Moore v. Valley III et al
as 1:2023cv00090
Plaintiff:
Jimmy C Moore
Defendant:
Randy Valley III, Rona Siegert, Corizon Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthew Lott v. Corizon, Inc., et al
as 23-1105
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW LESLIE LOTT
Defendant / Appellee:
CORIZON, INC., R. JINDELL, Physician Assistant, PETER SCICES, Medical Doctor and others
Kay Dana v. Idaho Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-35047
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KAY LYNN DANA, FKA Larry Dana
Defendant / Appellee:
IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOSH TEWALT, BREE DERRICK and others
Byrd v. Corizon, LLC, et al
as 5:2023cv06005
Defendant:
Corizon, LLC,, Corizon, Inc., Corizon, Health, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jeri Byrd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Adree Edmo v. Corizon, Inc., et al
as 22-35876
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ADREE EDMO, AKA Mason Edmo
Defendant / Appellant:
CORIZON, INC., SCOTT ELIASON, IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION and others
Defendant:
MURRAY YOUNG and CATHERINE WHINNERY
Matthew Lott v. Corizion, Inc., et al
as 22-1752
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW L. LOTT
Defendant / Appellee:
CORIZON, INC., R. JINDELL, Physician Assistant, PETER SCICES, Medical Doctor and others
Brown v. Corizon Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
Richard F. Brown
Defendant:
Corizon Inc., Centurion Inc., Joule Stevenson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
