Cases 1 - 10 of 124
Resch v. Edgar-Lindhout et al
as 2:2022cv12165
Plaintiff:
Brandon Resch
Defendant:
Andrea Edgar-Lindhout, Beth Kalis, Luba Nagorny and others
Cary v. Farris et al
as 2:2022cv12136
Plaintiff:
Bryan Cary
Defendant:
Kim Farris and Corizon Medical
Phillip Turner v. MDOC, et al
as 22-1562
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PHILLIP TURNER
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director, SHERRY L. BURT, Warden and others
Stokley et al v. Farmer et al
as 5:2022cv00033
Plaintiff:
Thomas Dwayne Stokley, Jr., Timothy Smith and Austin Rankin
Defendant:
Director Lisa Farmer, Corizon Medical and Trinity
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
West v. Lexington Fayette Urban County Government et al
as 5:2022cv00021
Plaintiff:
Kameron West
Defendant:
Lexington Fayette Urban County Government and Corizon Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cary v. Corizon Medical et al
as 2:2021cv12665
Plaintiff:
Bryan Allen Cary
Defendant:
Corrizon Medical, K. Farris, O. and others
Lamar Burton v. MDOC, et al
as 21-1637
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAMAR BURTON
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CORIZON MEDICAL, INC., named as Employees of Corizon Medical, DAVID HUYGE and others
Turner #171187 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv00790
Plaintiff:
Phillip Turner #171187
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Heidi Washington, Sherry Burt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clary Doss, Jr. v. Corizon Medical Corporation, et al
as 21-1423
Defendant / Appellee:
CORIZON MEDICAL CORPORATION and DONALD HAIDERER, MDOC Doctor
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLARY DOSS, JR.
McSwain #580468 v. Heinemann et al
as 1:2021cv00317
Defendant:
Heinemann, Unknown Fox, Unknown Cook and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn Diarra McSwain and Shawn McSwain #580468
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
